Mall Mania Part 4 (Remixed Peterson Style)

Here are a few excerpts from an interview with Eugene Peterson.

You make spirituality sound so mundane.
I don’t want to suggest that those of us who are following Jesus don’t have any fun, that there’s no joy, no exuberance, no ecstasy. They’re just not what the consumer thinks they are. When we advertise the gospel in terms of the world’s values, we lie to people. We lie to them, because this is a new life. It involves following Jesus. It involves the Cross. It involves death, an acceptable sacrifice. We give up our lives.

The Gospel of Mark is so graphic this way. The first half of the Gospel is Jesus showing people how to live. He’s healing everybody. Then right in the middle, he shifts. He starts showing people how to die: “Now that you’ve got a life, I’m going to show you how to give it up.” That’s the whole spiritual life. It’s learning how to die. And as you learn how to die, you start losing all your illusions, and you start being capable now of true intimacy and love.

It involves a kind of learned passivity, so that our primary mode of relationship is receiving, submitting, instead of giving and getting and doing. We don’t do that very well. We’re trained to be assertive, to get, to apply, or to consume and to perform.

Repentance, dying to self, submission-these are not very attractive hooks to draw people into the faith.
I think the minute you put the issue that way you’re in trouble. Because then we join the consumer world, and everything then becomes product designed to give you something. We don’t need something more. We don’t need something better. We’re after life. We’re learning how to live.

I think people are fed up with consumer approaches, even though they’re addicted to them. But if we cast the evangel in terms of benefits, we’re setting people up for disappointment. We’re telling them lies.

This is not the way our Scriptures are written. This is not the way Jesus came among us. It’s not the way Paul preached. Where do we get all this stuff? We have a textbook. We have these Scriptures and most of the time they’re saying, “You’re going the wrong way. Turn around. The culture is poisoning.”

Do we realize how almost exactly the Baal culture of Canaan is reproduced in American church culture? Baal religion is about what makes you feel good. Baal worship is a total immersion in what I can get out of it. And of course, it was incredibly successful. The Baal priests could gather crowds that outnumbered followers of Yahweh 20 to 1. There was sex, there was excitement, there was music, there was ecstasy, there was dance. “We got girls over here, friends. We got statues, girls, and festivals.” This was great stuff. And what did the Hebrews have to offer in response? The Word. What’s the Word? Well, Hebrews had festivals, at least!

Still, the one big hook or benefit to Christian faith is salvation, no? “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved.” Is this not something we can use to legitimately attract listeners?
It’s the biggest word we have-salvation, being saved. We are saved from a way of life in which there was no resurrection. And we’re being saved from ourselves. One way to define spiritual life is getting so tired and fed up with yourself you go on to something better, which is following Jesus.

But the minute we start advertising the faith in terms of benefits, we’re just exacerbating the self problem. “With Christ, you’re better, stronger, more likeable, you enjoy some ecstasy.” But it’s just more self. Instead, we want to get people bored with themselves so they can start looking at Jesus.

We’ve all met a certain type of spiritual person. She’s a wonderful person. She loves the Lord. She prays and reads the Bible all the time. But all she thinks about is herself. She’s not a selfish person. But she’s always at the center of everything she’s doing. “How can I witness better? How can I do this better? How can I take care of this person’s problem better?” It’s me, me, me disguised in a way that is difficult to see because her spiritual talk disarms us.

So how should we visualize the Christian life?
In church last Sunday, there was a couple in front of us with two bratty kids. Two pews behind us there was another couple with their two bratty kids making a lot of noise. This is mostly an older congregation. So these people are set in their ways. Their kids have been gone a long time. And so it wasn’t a very nice service; it was just not very good worship. But afterwards I saw half a dozen of these elderly people come up and put their arms around the mother, touch the kids, sympathize with her. They could have been irritated.

Now why do people go to a church like that when they can go to a church that has a nursery, is air conditioned, and all the rest? Well, because they’re Lutherans. They don’t mind being miserable! Norwegian Lutherans!

And this same church recently welcomed a young woman with a baby and a three-year-old boy. The children were baptized a few weeks ago. But there was no man with her. She’s never married; each of the kids has a different father. She shows up at church and wants her children baptized. She’s a Christian and wants to follow in the Christian way. So a couple from the church acted as godparents. Now there are three or four couples in the church who every Sunday try to get together with her.

Now, where is the “joy” in that church? These are dour Norwegians! But there’s a lot of joy. There’s an abundant life going, but it’s not abundant in the way a non-Christian would think. I think there’s a lot more going on in churches like this; they’re just totally anticultural. They’re full of joy and faithfulness and obedience and care. But you sure wouldn’t know it by reading the literature of church growth, would you?

But many pastors see people suffering in bad marriages, with drug addiction, with greed. And so they rightly want to help them now, by whatever method will work.
Yes, except something backfires on you when you’re impatient. How do we meet the need? Do we do it in Jesus’ way or do we do it the Wal-Mart way?

What if we were to frame this not in terms of needs but relevance? Many Christians hope to speak to generation X or Y or postmoderns, or some subgroup, like cowboys or bikers-people for whom the typical church seems irrelevant.
When you start tailoring the gospel to the culture, whether it’s a youth culture, a generation culture or any other kind of culture, you have taken the guts out of the gospel. The gospel of Jesus Christ is not the kingdom of this world. It’s a different kingdom.

. . . I think relevance is a crock. I don’t think people care a whole lot about what kind of music you have or how you shape the service. They want a place where God is taken seriously, where they’re taken seriously, where there is no manipulation of their emotions or their consumer needs.

Why did we get captured by this advertising, publicity mindset? I think it’s destroying our church.

. . . And if we present a rendition of the faith in which all the mystery is removed, and there’s no reverence, how are people ever going to know there’s something more than just their own emotions, their own needs? There’s something a lot bigger than my needs that’s going on. How do I ever get to that if the church service and worship program is all centered on my needs?

Some people would argue that it’s important to have a worship service in which people feel comfortable so they can hear the gospel.

I think they’re wrong. Take the story I told you about this family in front of us on Sunday. Nobody was comfortable. The whole church was miserable.

And yet, they might have experienced more gospel in going up and putting their arms around that poor mother, who was embarrassed to death.

How do we know when they have moved from merely adapting ministry to the culture to sacrificing the gospel?
One test I think is this: Am I working out of the Jesus story, the Jesus methods, the Jesus way? Am I sacrificing relationship, personal attention, personal relationship for a shortcut, a program so I can get stuff done? You can’t do Jesus’ work in a non-Jesus way and get by with it-although you can be very “successful.”

Comments

  1. Man Wade, you’ve been posting some good stuff lately. As a matter of fact, I just posted about something similar to this over at my blog. It’s amazing how we’ve gotten so off track in the American church, and it blows my mind how people think that evangelism is “bringing someone to church”.

    The way I see it, the first century worship gatherings were about corporately praising God and pouring out your life… not entertaining someone into a relationship with Jesus. Evangelism was something that happened because you were a disciple. I think I’m going to use your trackback feature on this one.

    Beneath His Mercy,
    Brian

  2. Well, I can’t figure out how to do the trackback, so I’ll just enter the link to my post in this comment:

    http://brianburkett.blogspot.com/2005/03/authentic.html

  3. Sam Middlebrook says:

    Spoken like a true believer who has been entrenched in faith for decades.

    He’s very unattached, though, from the non-believeing folks who regualarly walk through the doors of our church. Yes, they want reverance and a sense of the mystery and holiness of God, but they want in a way they can understand in the context of their daily lives.

  4. Sam Middlebrook says:

    sorry for my lack of good spelling…

  5. Ahh, but Sunday morning isn’t about the unbeliever, Sam… it’s about believers worshiping their God.

  6. Remember, those who aren’t spiritual cannot discern spiritual things anyway, according to Paul.

    1Co 2:14 The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.

    Our gatherings were never intended to be for them. Evangelism should happen in the context of relationships with unbelievers. If the Holy Spirit should convict an unbeliever in one of our gatherings, then great! Still, our focus should be on the believer connecting with God, not the unbeliever.

  7. Sam Middlebrook says:

    But you’re assuming that our main gathering is a church service, which it isn’t, at least not at my church. We view our weekend services as a way to invite our non-believeing friends into a place where they can see worship, hear the Word, and have salvation offered to them in an understanable way. Our Sunday night services are for the believer – communion, one-another prayer, deep teaching, etc… On top of all of that, there’s small groups – the real “church” experience.

    You can’t honestly tell me that what we all do on Sundays (my church and your church included) is what the apsotle Paul had in mind for us to consider “church”.

  8. Sam Middlebrook says:

    And, by the way, it is our job to to help the unbeliver understand…

    Romans 8:14-15… “How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? 15And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, ‘How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!'”

  9. Sam,

    No, the sad truth is that you are right about what we do on Sundays… that’s why I’m making a concerted effort to change that at our church. And, so far as it being our job to help the unbeliever understand, I could not agree with you more! You are absolutely right! But, I don’t think that a gathering of the saints is the place to do that. At least, not the way that we have been doing it for the last 20 or 25 years… We spend millions of dollars in America entertaining pagans each week… somehow, this doesn’t seem right. My church needs to repent of this as well, in my mind.

    And coming from me, being a 27 year old guy who wasn’t raised in the church with preconceived notions of what it should be, I hope I don’t sound like Phillip Yancey does to you… someone who is absolutely disconnected from unbelievers… I just don’t think I fit that bill.

  10. Sam Middlebrook says:

    I understand. I’m 27 as well, raised entirely in the church environment. What part of the country are you in? I think regional culture has a lot to do with the way we do things. We’re north of Seattle, Wa, and only about 3% of our county population attends church. Do you know any of the spiritual demograhpics/statistics for your area? I’m think that we agree on this, but come out at from different angles more because of culture than philosphy.

  11. Ok-I’ll admit Peterson comes across as a bit crotchety in this interview, but before we label him as “out of touch”, let’s remember he’s the guy who did the paraphrase of the bible in contemporary language that most of us read in our quiet time and that some of us read in our churches.

  12. Sam Middlebrook says:

    Wade,

    Again – he connects very well with the believeing audience. I just think he’s a bit out of touch with the common, uneducated, non-believer – at least the ones that are at my church.

  13. Sam,

    To answer your question, I am in Indiana… while there are a lot of people that “go to church” in this area, I would say that maybe only 20% of them are really “getting it”. What I mean is, understanding what the true message of the cross is…

So, what are you thinking?