Rite of Baptism Trickles Away

I’ve been engaged in a number of conversations recently about why more people aren’t being baptized at Garnett. There are lots of simplistic answers given. Everybody claims to have a magic bullet that will work. I’ve stubbornly insisted that things aren’t so simple. Here’s an interesting article that leads me to believe that simply offering more altar calls and invitations isn’t going to increase the number of baptisms in any congregation, including mine.

I’ve highlighted a couple sections below that I found to be of particular interest.

USATODAY.com – Rite of baptism trickles away

Every month there’s a cheering, weeping, air-horn-tooting celebration at First Assembly of God in North Little Rock, when the Rev. Rod Loy immerses new believers in the baptismal tank.

“This is a sign that someone understands the ideas of sin and Christ’s sacrifice and willfully chooses to be a lifelong follower of Jesus,” says the pastor. “So we celebrate it big.”

For believers, baptism is modeled on their savior, who the Bible says waded into the water to consecrate himself to God.

They may be sprinkled, washed from a flowing pitcher or immersed, as faith rituals vary. But all forms point to beliefs: rebirth in faith, salvation from sin, acceptance of God’s promises and charges.

For parents who bring a baby before their church, baptism is a pledge of their faith, a shield against evil, a wrapping of communal arms around a defenseless soul.

For Christians of all denominations, “even if they never darkened the door of a church any other time in their life … there’s a tendency to hold onto this life-cycle marker,” says the Rev. Paul Sullins, a sociologist at Catholic University in Washington, D.C.

Yet, this Easter, the holy day of resurrection, statistics find Americans slowly drifting away from the ancient baptismal ritual.

The Catholic Church has more than doubled in size in the past half-century, but its rate of infant baptism steadily has fallen, Sullins says.

Methodists and Lutherans have seen both baptisms and their membership numbers slide for years.

Even Loy’s denomination, the Assemblies of God, which has had a boom in membership since 1980, saw its annual baptism numbers peak in 1997, then inch downward.

The Southern Baptist Convention has seen a half-century decline in baptisms and stalled growth in membership.

In response, the Rev. Bobby Welch, president of the Southern Baptist Convention, is leading a national campaign to reverse the trend.

Behind the drop, experts see pressures ranging from fewer babies since the postwar boom, to increased secularization and interfaith marriage, to more “seeker churches” that downplay tradition.

Among Catholics, Sullins says, the rate of baptisms has fallen faster than the rate of decline in births.

Baptism isn’t the only source of new members. The church’s U.S. numbers – up from 31.6 million in 1954 to 67.8 million last year – also have grown through immigration. And at Saturday’s Easter vigil, the church will receive tens of thousands of adult converts.

The sociologist also links fewer infant baptisms to two trends involving marriage. Fewer Catholics are choosing to marry in the church, and Sullins says they may be less “attached to the sacraments.” And, since a change in church law in 1983, Catholics who marry non-Catholics no longer must promise to baptize and rear their children as Catholics.

Intermarriage slows baptisms

Now the church requires only “a general recognition by the couple that the Catholic partner’s faith will be respected.”

“The more you see more inter-faith marriages or couples where one partner is lukewarm or hostile to organized religion, the more you will see baptism taper off,” says the Rev. James Martin, associate editor of the Jesuit magazine America and author of My Life with the Saints

“I know friends who themselves are strongly Catholic but who married people inimical to the church, and it’s hard to agree on what they should do with their baby. At the very least, it delays baptism. The more delayed, the less likely it is to happen at all,” he says.

All the denominations that emphasize infant baptism, such as Catholics, Methodists and Lutherans, struggle with a contemporary culture that rejects the very idea that humanity is born into sin or that parents should steer children’s spiritual development, says the Rev. Gayle Carlton Felton, author of the United Methodist Church’s statement on baptism theology and practice, This Gift of Water.

Methodists “no longer literally believe that baptism removes the burden of sin that would send a child to hell,” Felton says. But it’s still essential because “it’s God’s claim on the child’s life.

“Something real is happening in a baptism,” Felton says. “For mainline liturgical churches, the actor here is God, claiming that child for his own. It doesn’t matter if the child remembers it. God does.”

Denominations that baptize only believers – older kids and adults who profess change of heart and want to witness this with an outward sign – also are seeing a decline.

The Southern Baptist Convention has seen its rate of baptism fall about 35% from 1972 to 1985, midway through a decade when the denomination was torn by dissension over an ultra-conservative leadership takeover.

Then the rate stalled for the next 20 years, even though Baptists are pledged to heed the Bible’s “great commission” in Matthew 28:19-20: “Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you. …”

When religion columnist Terry Mattingly caught up with Welch’s baptism campaign bus last fall, Welch told him just 40% of Southern Baptist Convention converts were truly unchurched before. “What that means is that we’re not reaching the pagan pool. … We’re just rearranging the furniture inside the church.”

Unlike the slow-growing Southern Baptist Convention, the Assemblies of God’s number of adherents grew from nearly 1.8 million in 1980 to nearly 2.8 million in 2004. But the total number of baptisms by immersion in water or by the Holy Spirit – experiencing the gift of speaking in tongues, one of the denomination’s distinctly Pentecostal beliefs – has hovered from around 175,000 to 200,000 yearly.

If baptism is the door into a faith, where did all those people go?

Like Welch, the Rev. George Wood, general secretary of the Assemblies of God, sees Christians play musical chairs, looking for the right fit in theology, worship style and ministry services. “At the church where I pastored years ago in Orange County, we had to grow 30% every year just to stay even with the mobility in the culture,” Wood says. And, he adds, not all new or reborn faith takes root.

Today, some parents refuse to plant it at all.

There are now baptism-style ceremonies where God is never mentioned by parents seeking to initiate their children into a world of all faiths, says Ema Drouillard of San Francisco, who runs the website Ceremonyway.com.

She conducted such an event for Kirsten and Farnum Alston of Marin County, Calif., for their baby, Greer, in 1998. “We just wanted a larger spirit to guide our daughter, but we didn’t want to get specific. I wanted all her bases covered,” says Kirsten Alston. The couple grew up Presbyterian, but now “we just do Christianity L-I-T-E” for Greer, who “believes in angels and fairies, leprechauns and Santa Claus.”

Non-traditional paths to God

Churches in the ’90s began actively courting church-wary people. These “seeker” churches often de-emphasized strict theology and practice, and gave a less prominent role to baptisms.

“We focused so much on the personal decision, the big deal of turning your life over to Christ, that the public, external identification – baptism – was less important in practice,” says the Rev. Brian McLaren, who co-founded the non-denominational Cedar Ridge Community Church in Spencerville, Md.

Yet McLaren, who retired in January to write and lecture, sees change in the air, particularly when he looks at young church leaders such as the Rev. Rob Bell, 35, who Christianity Today once said “puts the hip in discipleship.”

At Bell’s non-denominational Mars Hill Bible Church in Grandville, Mich., where 12,000 worshipers gather weekly in a former mall, they roll in a portable tank every few weeks so baptismal candidates can witness their conversion to the whole congregation. “We are baptizing more people than ever,” because “people are desperate for something ancient and lasting and meaningful,” Bell says.

Even if baptisms aren’t rising in numbers, they’re on the rise in significance, McLaren says.

Baptism is “a commitment to a lifelong spiritual practice, a discipleship, not a one-time event.”

Comments

  1. Is the way the church of Christ does baptism a heritage commitment or core belief?

  2. Todd–what do you mean by “the way the church of Christ does baptism?”

  3. Fair question!

    Immersion for salvation.

  4. Todd-At Garnett, the following statement is for us a core belief, “We believe that baptism is a part of the salvation experience. We believe in the practice of baptism by immersion in water.”

    I believe that the NT teaches that immersion is the normative response to the gospel.

    However, the place I think where Church of Christ baptismal theology could be improved is to shift our emphasis on baptism as something you “have to do in order to go to heaven when you die” to seeing it as more of a portal in which we are transported into the divine life, which begins in this age and carries on into the age to come.

    Somewhere along the way baptism became for us a “have to” instead of a “get to.” A duty to be observed rather than a privelege to be celebrated.

    A great book about this kind of thing is “Down to the River to Pray” by Hicks and Taylor.

  5. I think your response to Todd says more about the slip than any other comment. Rites are dead and we must embrace the celebration of this gift from God during this transition time.

  6. Interesting question and article, Wade. I have noticed the same trend in my experience among Churches of Christ. We were not really baptizing our own, much less converts. Basically, it seemed that people were just not buying into the plea.

    I do differ with one of Kevin’s comments. Rites are certainly not dead–and praise God that they’re not! But they must be timeless and must have authenticity. I agree with Rob Bell’s comment “people are desperate for something ancient, lasting and meaningful.”

    In fact, it is this sentiment that led me from the Church of Christ to the Orthodox Church. Now, my perspective on baptism is a little different. There are a number of similarities, though. First, baptism is very, very important in Orthodoxy. Also, the Church baptizes by immersion (3 times, actually), and for the remission of sins. But there, the similarities start to fade, for the Orthodox baptize infants. Now this seems an insurmountable stretch for someone fairly steeped in C o C doctrine. But I was moving towards a sacramental view of baptism long before I left the C o C, coming to believe that the efficacy of baptism lay in the power of God and not in the understanding of the one being baptized.

    The major difference I see, however, is that in the C of C (or Baptists, or other evangelicals for that matter) see salvation as characterized by an event in time-when one is baptized, or say for Baptists, when one “accepts Jesus Christ into their heart.” Wade, I like how you put it: “seeing it as more of a portal in which we are transported into the divine life, which begins in this age and carries on into the age to come.” That’s Orthodox with a big “O.” 🙂 But you have to admit, that is not the traditional understanding among Churches of Christ or Baptists. The view is changing, but slowly.

    The Orthodox understanding is different-salvation is a process and a journey, not an event. Regardless of whether one is baptized as an infant or as an adult convert, the journey of the believer and the charge to the believer is the same–to live out lives of repentance, to live out, in effect, one?s baptism. The Orthodox do not rebaptize converts. And converts who have not been baptized are not hurried into doing so. As long as you are “journeying towards God, there seems to be no anxiety on the part of clergy for those inquirers who have not yet been baptized. It is part of the journey, and as they say, it will happen “in God?s own time.” Mind you, I am no expert in Orthodoxy, but these are my impressions.

    Wade, I really enjoy your posts!

  7. Wade:
    Several years ago about 16 men in our church were studying together for a year, under the leadership of our elders. One Saturday morning the question was raised, “What do we really believe about baptism here at Long Beach? Is it essential for salvation?” One of our elders made the following statement, which I thought very insightful. He said, “Baptism is not essential for salvation, but it’s not optional for the believer.” His point being God is sovereign and can save whom he wants to save, but from our perspective it’s not an elective.

  8. Core belief or heritage issue. I’m guessing the view of baptism in the church of Christ has two significant impacts on the church itself.

    First, it’s a core belief for some. There will be folks within the CoC who will say that the emersion, of believers as a salvific act is absolute. For these individuals within the community it will actually harm their faith to believe otherwise.

    Second, the CoC’s particular view is a heritage view for others. There will be folks you talk to who will say that this view of baptism is actually harmful to the good news. So by holding this view, it harms others.

    Isn’t it interesting, and problematic, that a church can have a doctrine, or belief that is similtaneously encourages and destroys the faith of those who wish to follow Jesus.

  9. When you change the focus of the discussion from baptism to discipleship it’s no surprise there might be fewer who sign up. Imagine having a seminar on the wedding day and all it entails attempting to persuade people to be married. Compare that to a seminar on the necessity of personal sacrifice in order to have a lasting marriage. I think we’d get different levels commitment to the idea at each seminar.

  10. Sam Middlebrook says:

    It’s interesting to read that after what was published in the local paper on Easter Sunday, much of it taken from interviews at my church…

    http://www.bellinghamherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060416/LIFE08/604160348/1001/NEWS

  11. Wade:

    Although we haven’t met, I have a deep appreciation for what I’ve been reading on your blog.

    My first exposure to the “emergent conversation” was almost two years ago when I heard Brian McLaren at the Zoe Conference. Since then, I’ve read everything he and many others in the loop have written. I was also able to attend the Emergent Convention in Nashville.

    I don’t have a specific comment. I just wanted to let you know that your part of this whole conversation so refreshing–so much what I imagine the discussions with Jesus would have been like as He talked about the emerging kingdom of God almost 2000 years ago.

    God bless!
    Bill in Delaware

  12. When Philip preached Jesus to the man from Ethiopia, he requested baptism. When we get people immersed in Jesus they will not balk at baptism. Last year Southeast Christian Church in Louisville, KY, where Bob Russell preaches, baptized 1,399 people. Preaching Jesus draws people to the cross and when they get to the cross they learn that they, like Christ Himself, must die, be buried, and rise again. Preach Jesus more and you’ll have more baptisms. Preach Jesus less and you’ll have less. Preach issues more and you’ll have even less … or none at all!

  13. I have had to think about this for a few days. I am also reading Greg Taylor’s book, which is giving me a broader insight. I am also influenced by my extended families’ Lutheran upbringing. Baptism happened as an infant, but to become a church “member”, confirmation was the rite of passage. Baptism and Belief were continually confessed and other spiritual disciplines practiced. I guess I have always believed in more than one path to God. However, having experienced baptism as a teenager, it was a great experience that caused me to choose the spiritual path of my life. It didn’t end at the water, it began. I also see a correlation in the washing of the Disciples feet when Jesus says, “Unless I wash you, you have no part with me.” In the faith step of baptism, we are washed and renewed. It was a response for me after several years of turmoil and I wanted to “begin” again. I teach my children that they are already “members” of the church so to speak. They come, they are involved, and they love our church family. I also tell them that when they are ready to give their life and spiritual commitment to Jesus, then they are ready for baptism.

  14. I also had one more thought. Could it be that the “bible belt” is just now being caught up in the kind of cynacism toward christianity that has existed on the coasts for decades now. Christianity (& its practices) may be deemed ancient or out of touch. Definitely not accepting or inclusive of all people and all beliefs. This trend seems to be more common among the unchurched. No relevant need for Jesus in daily life. Many of my neighbors live this way. Good people, raising families, no visible crisis in their lives. We are the only family in our culd-e-sac that attends church. Just thinking…

  15. I like Max Lucado’s comment on baptism:

    Baptism separates the tire kickers from the car buyers.

    His entire thoughts on the subject are here:

    http://www.maxlucado.com/pdf/baptism.upwords.pdf

    Peace

  16. I have to agree that we have too long marketed baptism as a “have-to” rather than a “get-to” … and I agree with Kevin that we would do well to begin positioning it as the gift of baptism.

  17. “Baptism is not essential for salvation, but it?s not optional for the believer.”

    Greg,

    You said, “”Baptism is not essential for salvation, but it?s not optional for the believer.”

    This statement doesn?t make sense to me. If baptism isn?t essential for salvation, then it has to be an option. I don?t see how it could be otherwise.

    Riddle,
    You said, “Second, the CoC?s particular view is a heritage view for others. There will be folks you talk to who will say that this view of baptism is actually harmful to the good news. So by holding this view, it harms others.
    Isn?t it interesting, and problematic, that a church can have a doctrine, or belief that is simultaneously encourages and destroys the faith of those who wish to follow Jesus.”
    Firstly, it shouldn?t really matter if baptism is a heritage view of others. The question is really whether it is a heritage view of those in the first century. In other words, do those in the church of Christ who believe baptism is essential because they inherited this belief or because it?s what they believe the Bible teaches?
    Secondly, so baptism is a stumbling block to these people you describe. That is unfortunate, but you could say this about any other thing that Christ would require of us as well. It seems like we?re trying here to eliminate all the hard or inconvenient things Jesus asks us to do to make it “easy on the eyes”.

  18. Victor said: “Preach Jesus more and you?ll have more baptisms. Preach Jesus less and you?ll have less. Preach issues more and you?ll have even less … or none at all!”

    Victor, if baptism isn’t necessary then you can preach Jesus more or less and shouldn’t be as concerned with baptism. However,if baptism is important and necessary then that would need to be included in what preaching Jesus is all about.

    It seems to me that in our efforts to get rid of baptism as a necessary act of obedience (which is a part of discipleship), we’re left not wanting to get rid of it, but yet it hangs there and we’re not quite sure what to do with it.

  19. Lynn said: “Christianity (& its practices) may be deemed ancient or out of touch. Definitely not accepting or inclusive of all people and all beliefs. This trend seems to be more common among the unchurched. No relevant need for Jesus in daily life.”

    Lynn, Christianity as always been out of touch with the culture around it. When was it the norm? Are we trying to convert people to Christ, who need to conform to his image, or are we trying, in an effort to be “relevant”, conforming our lives to theirs?

    Christianity is accepting of all people since God wishes for no one to be lost, but it, by definition, could not and cannot accept all beliefs. Otherwise, it ceases to be a discipleship or following after Christ.

  20. I should have stated that my intent was not to cause intended offense, but since I am a member of a church of Christ with whom you all may describe as “hard-lined” or “narrow”, I’m just trying to understand this movement and I can only do so by conversing with you all. 🙂

  21. joel,

    I never said baptism was a stumbling block. my comment was directed at a doctrine. these are different things.

    and.

    I agree. Let’s look to the intent of the scripture and how the spirit engaged the first century world and then understanding context, we can then listen to the intent of scripture and then engage the spirit for our world.

    that sounds pretty healthy to me.

Trackbacks

So, what are you thinking?